Shriekfest 2010: “[REC],” “Candyman,” “28 Days Later”

“[REC]” (2007)
Starring Manuela Velasco, Pablo Rosso, Claudia Silva, Ana Velasquez

Most horror films try to give us a jolt or two, but the great ones tap into those way-down-deep primitive fears we try to pretend we’re too evolved to have. In the frenetic and chilling “[REC],” directors Jaume Balagueró and Paco Plaza accomplish this task with not much more than a hand-held video camera, an apartment building and a small cast required to react more than act. Presented as found footage, the film details a routine day of shooting for Spanish TV reporter Ángela Vidal (Velasco) and her cameraman Pablo (Rosso) that turns ghoulish. The pair, getting footage for a documentary TV show, tail a fire crew on a distress call to a Barcelona apartment complex. A crazed elderly woman attacks one of the firemen, the building is swiftly quarantined and the alarmed residents are told nothing. That first chomp-down gives “[REC]” a violent shove into action overdrive, with an infection turning the trapped residents into raving, uncontrollable creatures. The jittery camerawork is an ace fit for the tight setting, and there are off-camera bangs and shrieks aplenty in the dark to keep the terror quotient consistently high. Given the volatile setting and lickety-split pace, the characters-as-types approach works well (there’s no time to care about the people as anything other than humans). And the ending, a sublime combination of claustrophobia, nyctophobia and our fear of unexplained noises, is a harrowing descent into hell. A-

“Candyman” (1992)
Starring Virginia Madsen, Tony Todd, Xander Berkeley, Kasi Lemmons

“Candyman,” with its focus on the pervasiveness of urban legends, tells a familiar story from an unusual perspective. Instead of morality play about the dangers of meddling kids with too much time on their hands and a death wish, Clive Barker’s film spins a bizarre, spooky and downright metaphorical yarn about how these legends not only survive but thrive through the years. Helen Lyle (Madsen), a graduate student, wants to author a thesis on urban legends. There is one in particular – of a murderous spirit called “Candyman” (Tony Scott) who haunts a crime-ridden Chicago housing project and may have killed a tenant there – that intrigues her. She and her friend Bernadette (Lemmons) attempt to summon the spirit, believed to be a murdered slave with an understandable grudge, in her bathroom mirror and laugh nervously when nothing happens. Oh, would that it were that easy. In summoning Candyman, Helen gives him free reign of her mind. She begins to have blackouts, people around her meet gruesome ends and the police hold her directly responsible. And to a degree, Helen wonders if she is guilty – of stirring memories best left slumbering, of feeding Candyman the fear and hysteria he needs to keep killing. Scott’s sinister performance is fodder for permanent night terrors. Deeper and scarier than Scott, though, is the notion that we create such legends and never let them starve. It’s a fate we doom ourselves to over and over. B

“28 Days Later” (2002)
Starring Cillian Murphy, Naomie Harris, Megan Burns, Brendan Gleeson

Just when zombie films started to get that icky, not-so-fresh feeling, along came “28 Days Later.” Danny Boyle has given the genre the makeover it badly needed. For starters, the “zombies” in question aren’t zombies at all, but human beings driven mad in 20 seconds (or less) by an unnamed disease. Replace the ragtag group of anonymous, generic survivors with Jim (Murphy), a London bicycle courier who awakens from a coma to find the world burning; Selena (Harris), whose has learned that surviving an apocalypse is easier when logic squashes feelings; and Frank (Gleeson) and Hannah (Burns), a father and daughter who, out of sheer emotional necessity, open their lives to Serena and Jim. They form an unconventional family and decide to strike out toward Manchester, where a crackly radio broadcast informs him the militia possesses “the answer to infection” – a decision with predictably awful (yet still surprising) consequences. Key to “28 Days Later,” which is part psychological thriller and part end-of-days tale, is the dreary cinematography and the taut atmosphere Boyle creates. He avoids the gore clichés, the “Boo!” scenes and the spare, obvious musical chords of warning, at every possible chance. So when the shocks come, they feel as uncalculated as everyday life gone horribly wonky. Murphy, Gleeson, Burns and especially Harris offer sympathetic — and intensely human — characters that make this situation more poignant than anyone would expect. A

Advertisements

9 Responses

  1. Shriekfest 2010: ?[REC],? ?Candyman,? ?28 Days Later?…

    I found your entry interesting do I’ve added a Trackback to it on my weblog :)…

  2. I’ve always thought of Candyman as a terrifically chilling horror film. When I first saw it it was one of the scariest things I’d ever seen because the whole bathroom mirror thing was so close to home (literally, in the bathroom next door to my bedroom). Today, I still think its horrific, frightening, and features two top-notch performances.

  3. be sure to check out [Rec] 2 if you haven’t seen it. it’s pretty good, and takes the story in an interesting direction.

  4. 28 Days Later is unreal (ridiculous how many people confuse it with that Sandra Bullock “28 Days” shit), never seen [REC], will be seeing it asap though, and I have a big thing for Candyman. Totally underappreciated bizarro horror movie. Just so grisly, quiet and strange. And Tony Todd is the man, so freakin’ creepy. (Tony Scott on the other hand, not so impressive in this movie.)

    • @ Dan — Since I saw this, Tony Scott will always and forever be Candyman. And I will admit that for days after seeing this I couldn’t look into the bathroom mirror for fear I’d say “Candyman” five times IN MY HEAD. And I’m 29 years old.

      @ NTWAC — I’ve read some excellent blogger reviews on “[REC] 2.” Apparently it’s like the “Aliens” of sequels.

      @ Aiden — I really enjoyed the ending to “Candyman.” There’s something unassailably cool about becoming an urban legend. Is there way to do that without dying? If so, sign me up.

  5. Love, love, love Candyman and basically anything with Tony Todd in it. Take every Bloody Mary myth you know and multiply it by ten and you still won’t have something quite so eerie and downright frightening. [REC] is a good one too, a solid entry in the found footage genre.

    But I can’t abide 28 Days Later, a film that takes a lot from Day of the Triffids without any of the subtext or wit. I expect characters to make bad decisions in horror movies– but not catastrophically stupid ones. I liked the acting but this movie just never worked for me.

  6. I always thought the setting for Candyman was strange. As much as I sort of enjoy it, the fact that it was this supernatural something that was pretty much based out of the urban projects, and a real project for that matter, just seemed weird to me. But, I might be a traditionalist in that I prefer my supernaturality to exist out in nature.

    • @ Andrew — For a long time I didn’t know Tony Todd as the Candyman. After seeing the movie, now I get why people think he’s cool, but would squirm a little if they found themselves alone with him in a public restroom. As for “Day of the Triffids,” I guess I should see that for comparison purposes.

      @ FRC Ruben — Yeah, the highly urban setting threw me off a bit. But maybe it’s there to prove that these kinds of Boogeyman stories can thrive anywhere, whether it’s rural Tennessee or the projects in Chicago?

  7. […] Possessing none of the bells and whistles of later efforts like “Dawn of the Dead” or “28 Days Later,” it’s still a nail-biter, and it’s still scary as […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: